Reading all these tort cases in the area of comparative negligence, I can't help but get a sense that we want to allow people’s families to get some compensation even when folks did something negligence to contribute to their own death because of lack of knowledge. So, are we moving away from Darwinism, survival of the fittest then, and want to do as much as we can to protect every life because there is intrinsic value in every life, from conception to death?